Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:15:05 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mst@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx, jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com>
References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com> <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com>

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800

> On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other
>> patch for next..
>>
>> Jason
> 
> Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle.

Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
  - From: Jason Wang

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
  - From: Jason Wang
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
  - From: Jason Wang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through kernel virtual address
Next by Date: [PULL] vhost, virtio: last minute fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]