On 04.09.19 09:33, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 9/4/19 9:13 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> If unknown bits are set in kvm_valid_regs or kvm_dirty_regs, this
>> clearly indicates that something went wrong in the KVM userspace
>> application. The x86 variant of KVM already contains a check for
>> bad bits (and the corresponding kselftest checks this), so let's
>> do the same on s390x now, too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think it would make sense to split the kvm changes from the test.
Yes, this would allow to backport the non-kselftest part if necessary.
With that
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 6 ++++
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 +++
>> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 47104e5b47fd..436ec7636927 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -231,6 +231,12 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
>> #define KVM_SYNC_GSCB (1UL << 9)
>> #define KVM_SYNC_BPBC (1UL << 10)
>> #define KVM_SYNC_ETOKEN (1UL << 11)
>> +
>> +#define KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS \
>> + (KVM_SYNC_PREFIX | KVM_SYNC_GPRS | KVM_SYNC_ACRS | KVM_SYNC_CRS | \
>> + KVM_SYNC_ARCH0 | KVM_SYNC_PFAULT | KVM_SYNC_VRS | KVM_SYNC_RICCB | \
>> + KVM_SYNC_FPRS | KVM_SYNC_GSCB | KVM_SYNC_BPBC | KVM_SYNC_ETOKEN)
>> +
>> /* length and alignment of the sdnx as a power of two */
>> #define SDNXC 8
>> #define SDNXL (1UL << SDNXC)
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index 49d7722229ae..a7d7dedfe527 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -3998,6 +3998,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
>> if (kvm_run->immediate_exit)
>> return -EINTR;
>>
>> + if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS ||
>> + kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>
>> if (guestdbg_exit_pending(vcpu)) {
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
>> index bbc93094519b..d5290b4ad636 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
>> @@ -85,6 +85,36 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>
>> run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
>>
>> + /* Request reading invalid register set from VCPU. */
>> + run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD;
>> + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>> + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
>> + "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
>> + rv);
>> + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
>> +
>> + run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
>> + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>> + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
>> + "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
>> + rv);
>> + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
>> +
>> + /* Request setting invalid register set into VCPU. */
>> + run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD;
>> + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>> + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
>> + "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
>> + rv);
>> + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
>> +
>> + run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
>> + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>> + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
>> + "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
>> + rv);
>> + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
>> +
>> /* Request and verify all valid register sets. */
>> run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
>> rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>>
>
>
