On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 01:56:18PM +0000, Anup Patel wrote: > int kvm_riscv_vcpu_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) > { > - /* TODO: */ > + u8 data8; > + u16 data16; > + u32 data32; > + u64 data64; > + ulong insn; > + int len, shift; > + > + insn = vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.insn; > + > + if (run->mmio.is_write) > + goto done; > + > + len = vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.len; > + shift = vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.shift; > + > + switch (len) { > + case 1: > + data8 = *((u8 *)run->mmio.data); > + SET_RD(insn, &vcpu->arch.guest_context, > + (ulong)data8 << shift >> shift); > + break; > + case 2: > + data16 = *((u16 *)run->mmio.data); > + SET_RD(insn, &vcpu->arch.guest_context, > + (ulong)data16 << shift >> shift); > + break; > + case 4: > + data32 = *((u32 *)run->mmio.data); > + SET_RD(insn, &vcpu->arch.guest_context, > + (ulong)data32 << shift >> shift); > + break; > + case 8: > + data64 = *((u64 *)run->mmio.data); > + SET_RD(insn, &vcpu->arch.guest_context, > + (ulong)data64 << shift >> shift); > + break; > + default: > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + }; > + > +done: > + /* Move to next instruction */ > + vcpu->arch.guest_context.sepc += INSN_LEN(insn); > + As I pointed out in the last review, just moving this instruction skip here is not enough. Doing so introduces the same problem that 2113c5f62b74 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Only skip MMIO insn once") fixes for arm. Thanks, drew