On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 03:38:16AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The comment we have is just repeating what the code does.
> Include the *reason* for the condition instead.
>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 94cc0fa3e848..5bb70c692b1e 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -307,8 +307,13 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>
> spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
> - /* We send a credit update only when the space available seen
> - * by the transmitter is less than VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE
> + /* To reduce the number of credit update messages,
> + * don't update credits as long as lots of space is available.
> + * Note: the limit chosen here is arbitrary. Setting the limit
> + * too high causes extra messages. Too low causes transmitter
> + * stalls. As stalls are in theory more expensive than extra
> + * messages, we set the limit to a high value. TODO: experiment
> + * with different values.
> */
> if (free_space < VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE) {
> virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk,
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
