On 19/08/19 20:30, Jim Mattson wrote: >>> Perhaps there is another patch coming for reporting Intel bits on AMD? >> I wasn't going to work on it but yes, they should be. This patch just >> fixed what was half-implemented. > I'm not sure that the original intent was to enumerate the AMD > features on Intel hosts, but it seems reasonable to do so. > > Should we also populate the AMD cache topology leaf (0x8000001d) on > Intel hosts? And so on? :-) > > Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. Note that I plan to send v2 tomorrow, and I've also done the part that reports Intel bits unconditionally. Paolo
