Re: [RFC PATCH v6 06/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/08/19 17:59, Adalbert Lazăr wrote:
> +If `now` is 1, the command reply is enabled/disabled (according to
> +`enable`) starting with the current command. For example, `enable=0`
> +and `now=1` means that the reply is disabled for this command too,
> +while `enable=0` and `now=0` means that a reply will be send for this
> +command, but not for the next ones (until enabled back with another
> +*KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE*).
> +
> +This command is used by the introspection tool to disable the replies
> +for commands returning an error code only (eg. *KVMI_SET_REGISTERS*)
> +when an error is less likely to happen. For example, the following
> +commands can be used to reply to an event with a single `write()` call:
> +
> +	KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE enable=0 now=1
> +	KVMI_SET_REGISTERS vcpu=N
> +	KVMI_EVENT_REPLY   vcpu=N
> +	KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE enable=1 now=0

I don't understand the usage.  Is there any case where you want now == 1
actually?  Can you just say that KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE never has a
reply, or to make now==enable?

> +	if (err)
> +		kvmi_warn(ikvm, "Error code %d discarded for message id %d\n",
> +			  err, msg->id);
> +

Would it make sense to even close the socket if there is an error?

Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux