Fair enough, yeah. I think what I found confusing was that the file had a precise (directly actionable in a file browser, if you will) path. If it was just listed as a filename, or a project name, it might have been more obvious that one shouldn't expect to find it within the kernel tree and just go look it up in your favorite search engine. The right incantation to get your hands on that file is a web search, not a local file navigation, and to my perception a full and seemingly valid path pointed in the direction of doing the wrong thing. It's not a huge deal, obviously, and it may be that I was the only one confused by that. If so, feel free to disregard the patch. Thanks, - Enrico Thanks, - Enrico On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 1:15 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:52:55PM -0700, egranata@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > lguest was removed from the mainline kernel in late 2017. > > > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxx> > > But this particular file even has an override in the script looking > for dead references, which together with the content of the overal > contents makes me thing the dangling reference is somewhat intentional.
