On 09/08/19 07:45, Wanpeng Li wrote: > From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Even if for realtime CPUs, cache line bounces, frequency scaling, presence > of higher-priority RT tasks, etc can cause different response. These > interferences should be considered and periodically revaluate whether > or not the lapic_timer_advance_ns value is the best, do nothing if it is, > otherwise recaluate again. How much fluctuation do you observe between different runs? Paolo