On 25.07.19 17:48, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 25.07.19 17:36, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 25.07.19 17:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> This adds a check for documented stfle dependencies. >>> >> >> Expected error under TCG: >> >> FAIL: cpumodel: dependency: 37 implies 42 >> >> DFP not implemented (yet). >> >> We also don't warn about this in check_consistency(), which is nice for >> TCG ;) > > So should I force this to KVM? Or should I try to detect TCG and make this > xfail? Hmm, good question. If it's broken, it's broken - maybe it's just the right thing to do here - let the test fail for TCG. Might take quite some time to fix, though :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
