Hi Paolo,
Would you help to review this patch, plz?
Many thanks.
---
Best wishes
Yi Wang
> 在 2019年7月6日，01:10，Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道：
>
> There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have
> been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fafd81d..86f9861 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz,
>
> *pshift = shift;
> *pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32);
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n",
> - __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> @@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) {
> if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
> offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset;
> - pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data);
> } else {
> u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
> data += delta;
> offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
> - pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta);
> }
> matched = true;
> already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation);
> @@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data;
> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset;
> matched = false;
> - pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n",
> - kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
> cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block,
> CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
> }
> - pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
>
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online",
> kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
