Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] KVM: vmx: handle vm-exit for UMWAIT and TPAUSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/13/2019 12:03 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:29:07PM +0800, Tao Xu wrote:
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -5213,6 +5213,9 @@ bool nested_vmx_exit_reflected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 exit_reason)
  	case EXIT_REASON_ENCLS:
  		/* SGX is never exposed to L1 */
  		return false;
+	case EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT: case EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE:

Grouped case statements are usually stacked vertically, e.g.:

	case EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT:
	case EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE:
Ok, thank you for your suggestion.

+		return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12,
+			SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE);
  	default:
  		return true;
  	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 0787f140d155..e026b1313dc3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5349,6 +5349,20 @@ static int handle_monitor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  	return handle_nop(vcpu);
  }
+static int handle_umwait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
+	WARN(1, "this should never happen\n");

Blech.  I'm guessing this code was copy-pasted from handle_xsaves() and
handle_xrstors().  The blurb of "this should never happen" isn't very
helpful, e.g. the WARN itself makes it pretty obvious that we don't expect
to reach this point.  WARN_ONCE would also be preferable, no need to spam
the log in the event things go completely haywire.

Rather than propagate ugly code, what about defining a common helper, e.g.

static int handle_unexpected_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
	kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
	WARN_ONCE(1, "Unexpected VM-Exit = 0x%x", vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_REASON));
	return 1;
}

...
{
	[EXIT_REASON_XSAVES]                  = handle_unexpected_vmexit,
	[EXIT_REASON_XRSTORS]                 = handle_unexpected_vmexit,

	[EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT]                  = handle_unexpected_vmexit,
	[EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE]                  = handle_unexpected_vmexit,

}

Thank you Sean, I will do this in next version of patch.

+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int handle_tpause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
+	WARN(1, "this should never happen\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+
  static int handle_invpcid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
  	u32 vmx_instruction_info;
@@ -5559,6 +5573,8 @@ static int (*kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
  	[EXIT_REASON_VMFUNC]		      = handle_vmx_instruction,
  	[EXIT_REASON_PREEMPTION_TIMER]	      = handle_preemption_timer,
  	[EXIT_REASON_ENCLS]		      = handle_encls,
+	[EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT]                  = handle_umwait,
+	[EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE]                  = handle_tpause,
  };
static const int kvm_vmx_max_exit_handlers =
--
2.20.1





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux