On 03/07/19 02:48, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Hi Paolo, how about this patchset? Patch 2/2 is easy to take, do you > have more concern about patch 1/2? I don't know. It seems somewhat hard to tune and in cyclictest it only happens for preemption_timer=N. Are you using preemption_timer=N together with the LAPIC-timer-on-service-CPU patches? Paolo