On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dor Laor<dlaor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/08/2009 07:40 AM, Martin Bligh wrote: >>> >>> ATM I will suggest to merge the patches in and let get tested so that >>> we can collect failures/breakages if any. >> >> I am not keen on causing regressions, which we've risked doing every >> time we change LTP. I think we at least need to get a run on a >> non-virtualized >> machine with some recent kernel, and exclude the tests that fail every >> time. > > We can use the reported results (impressive) as a base. > When more regressions are introduced, we can chop more tests Sure, soon will send the revised patch. Thanks everyone for your thoughts!! > -- Sudhir Kumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
