On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 05:34:46PM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote: > Hi, > > I tried your patch set, but only to check > that they didn't cause any regression for situations > where idle state 0 (Poll) is used a lot (teo governor). > > They didn't (my testing was not thorough). > > I do not know if the below matters or not. > > On 2019.06.13 15:46 Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > ... [snip] ... > > > Index: linux-2.6.git/Documentation/virtual/guest-halt-polling.txt > > =================================================================== > > --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 > > +++ linux-2.6.git/Documentation/virtual/guest-halt-polling.txt 2019-06-13 18:16:22.414262777 -0400 > > @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ > > +Guest halt polling > > +================== > > + > > +The cpuidle_haltpoll driver, with the haltpoll governor, allows > > +the guest vcpus to poll for a specified amount of time before > > +halting. > > +This provides the following benefits to host side polling: > > + > > + 1) The POLL flag is set while polling is performed, which allows > > + a remote vCPU to avoid sending an IPI (and the associated > > + cost of handling the IPI) when performing a wakeup. > ^ > |_ While applying the patches, git complains about this space character before the TAB. > > It also complains about a few patches with a blank line before EOF. > > ... Doug Hi Doug, Will fix those, thanks.
