Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Memory barrier before setting ICR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/25/19 5:58 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
The wrmsr that is used in x2apic ICR programming does not behave as a
memory barrier. There is a hidden assumption that it is. Add an explicit
memory barrier for this reason.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/x86/apic.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/x86/apic.c b/lib/x86/apic.c
index bc2706e..1514730 100644
--- a/lib/x86/apic.c
+++ b/lib/x86/apic.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
  #include "apic.h"
  #include "msr.h"
  #include "processor.h"
+#include "asm/barrier.h"
void *g_apic = (void *)0xfee00000;
  void *g_ioapic = (void *)0xfec00000;
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static void x2apic_write(unsigned reg, u32 val)
static void x2apic_icr_write(u32 val, u32 dest)
  {
+    mb();
      asm volatile ("wrmsr" : : "a"(val), "d"(dest),
                    "c"(APIC_BASE_MSR + APIC_ICR/16));
  }


Regarding non-serializing forms, the SDM mentions,

        "X2APIC MSRs (MSR indices 802H to 83FH)"


(APIC_BASE_MSR + APIC_ICR/16) is a different value. So I am wondering why we need a barrier here.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux