Re: [PATCH v17 01/10] hw/arm/virt: Add RAS platform version for migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019/6/25 21:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> In light of the race for leaner QEMU and faster startup times,
>>> it might be better to make RAS optional and make user explicitly
>>> enable it using a machine option.  
>> I will add a machine option to make RAS optional, do you think we should enable or disable it by default? I think it is better if we enable it by default.
> I'd start with disabled by default as it's easy to make it
> enabled by default later and we can't do so other way around.
ok

> 
>  
>>>   
>>>>  }
>>>>  DEFINE_VIRT_MACHINE(4, 0)
>>>>  
>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux