Re: [PATCH] kvm: tests: Sort tests in the Makefile alphabetically

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:47 PM Krish Sadhukhan
<krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/18/2019 07:14 AM, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:37 AM Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:14 AM Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Peter Shier <pshier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> >>> index 79c524395ebe..234f679fa5ad 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> >>> @@ -10,23 +10,23 @@ LIBKVM = lib/assert.c lib/elf.c lib/io.c lib/kvm_util.c lib/ucall.c lib/sparsebi
> >>>   LIBKVM_x86_64 = lib/x86_64/processor.c lib/x86_64/vmx.c
> >>>   LIBKVM_aarch64 = lib/aarch64/processor.c
> >>>
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/platform_info_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_sregs_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/sync_regs_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/state_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/evmcs_test
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/hyperv_cpuid
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smm_test
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/kvm_create_max_vcpus
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/platform_info_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_sregs_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smm_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/state_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/sync_regs_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += clear_dirty_log_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
>
> May be, place the last two at the beginning if you are arranging them
> alphabetically ?

The original scheme had everything in x86_64 first then everything in
the root folder second.  I wanted to maintain this scheme, so that's
why it is sorted this way.

>
> >>>
> >>> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += clear_dirty_log_test
> >>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
>
> May be, put the aarch64 ones above the x86_64 ones to arrange them
> alphabetically ?

I want to make a minimal change, so sorting the tags isn't a priority,
just the files.  The goal is to have a more predictable place to add
new tests, and I think this helps.

>
> >>>
> >>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(UNAME_M))
> >>>   LIBKVM += $(LIBKVM_$(UNAME_M))
> >>> --
> >>> 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog
> >>>
> >> Does this look okay?  It's just a simple reordering of the list.  It
> >> helps when adding new tests.
> > ping
>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux