On Tuesday 07 July 2009 07:31:30 Cristi Magherusan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 12:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 07/07/2009 05:42 AM, Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > > I'm using linux-2.6.26.8, uClibc-HEAD(linuxthreds, almost complete > > > setup) and gcc 4.3.3. > > > > > > Also, is this kernel version supposed to work with this kvm? > > > > Yes. > > Actually only the headers are 2.6.26.8, the oldest vesion found in > buildroot. (I wonder why are older ones being abandoned, since the new > ones tend to get bigger and bigger.) upgrade > The kernel will be 2.6.24 because it's smaller. I know this mismatch may > not be good, but I have to get to a compromise. The kernel needs to be > as small as possible (everything should fit in a 4MB BIOS flash), and > also to support both this version of KVM and OpenVZ at the same time. > Older KVM versions have terrible buildsystem issues and I gave up trying > to get them compile in buildroot. I think OpenVZ could work on 2.6.26 > too, but I haven't tried yet. > > Could this be a real problem at runtime? with uClibc, yes -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
