Re: [PATCH 16/43] KVM: nVMX: Always sync GUEST_BNDCFGS when it comes from vmcs01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You should apply something as the following instead of the original fix by Sean
to play nicely on upstream without additional dependency:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index f1a69117ac0f..3fc44852ed4f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2234,12 +2234,9 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_full(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)

        set_cr4_guest_host_mask(vmx);

-       if (kvm_mpx_supported()) {
-               if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
-                       (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS))
-                       vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs);
-               else
-                       vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_bndcfgs);
+       if (kvm_mpx_supported() && vmx->nested.nested_run_pending &&
+               (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)) {
+               vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs);
        }
 }

@@ -2283,6 +2280,10 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
                kvm_set_dr(vcpu, 7, vcpu->arch.dr7);
                vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, vmx->nested.vmcs01_debugctl);
        }
+       if (kvm_mpx_supported() && (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
+               !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS))) {
+               vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_bndcfgs);
+       }
        vmx_set_rflags(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_rflags);

        /* EXCEPTION_BITMAP and CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK should basically be the

-Liran

> On 16 Jun 2019, at 1:16, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> [This is an automated email]
> 
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: 62cf9bd8118c KVM: nVMX: Fix emulation of VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS.
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.9, v4.19.50.
> 
> v5.1.9: Build OK!
> v4.19.50: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>    09abb5e3e5e5 ("KVM: nVMX: call kvm_skip_emulated_instruction in nested_vmx_{fail,succeed}")
>    09abe3200266 ("KVM: nVMX: split pieces of prepare_vmcs02() to prepare_vmcs02_early()")
>    1438921c6dc1 ("KVM: nVMX: Flush TLB entries tagged by dest EPTP on L1<->L2 transitions")
>    199b118ab3d5 ("KVM: VMX: Alphabetize the includes in vmx.c")
>    1abf23fb42f5 ("KVM: nVMX: use vm_exit_controls_init() to write exit controls for vmcs02")
>    327c072187f7 ("KVM: nVMX: Flush linear and combined mappings on VPID02 related flushes")
>    3d5bdae8b164 ("KVM: nVMX: Use correct VPID02 when emulating L1 INVVPID")
>    3df5c37e55c8 ("KVM: nVMX: try to set EFER bits correctly when initializing controls")
>    55d2375e58a6 ("KVM: nVMX: Move nested code to dedicated files")
>    5b8ba41dafd7 ("KVM: nVMX: move vmcs12 EPTP consistency check to check_vmentry_prereqs()")
>    609363cf81fc ("KVM: nVMX: Move vmcs12 code to dedicated files")
>    75edce8a4548 ("KVM: VMX: Move eVMCS code to dedicated files")
>    7671ce21b13b ("KVM: nVMX: move check_vmentry_postreqs() call to nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode()")
>    945679e301ea ("KVM: nVMX: add enlightened VMCS state")
>    a633e41e7362 ("KVM: nVMX: assimilate nested_vmx_entry_failure() into nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode()")
>    a821bab2d1ee ("KVM: VMX: Move VMX specific files to a "vmx" subdirectory")
>    b8bbab928fb1 ("KVM: nVMX: implement enlightened VMPTRLD and VMCLEAR")
>    d63907dc7dd1 ("KVM: nVMX: rename enter_vmx_non_root_mode to nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode")
>    efebf0aaec3d ("KVM: nVMX: Do not flush TLB on L1<->L2 transitions if L1 uses VPID and EPT")
> 
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux