You should apply something as the following instead of the original fix by Sean to play nicely on upstream without additional dependency: diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c index f1a69117ac0f..3fc44852ed4f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c @@ -2234,12 +2234,9 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_full(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) set_cr4_guest_host_mask(vmx); - if (kvm_mpx_supported()) { - if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending && - (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)) - vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs); - else - vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_bndcfgs); + if (kvm_mpx_supported() && vmx->nested.nested_run_pending && + (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)) { + vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs); } } @@ -2283,6 +2280,10 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12, kvm_set_dr(vcpu, 7, vcpu->arch.dr7); vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, vmx->nested.vmcs01_debugctl); } + if (kvm_mpx_supported() && (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending || + !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS))) { + vmcs_write64(GUEST_BNDCFGS, vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_bndcfgs); + } vmx_set_rflags(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_rflags); /* EXCEPTION_BITMAP and CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK should basically be the -Liran > On 16 Jun 2019, at 1:16, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, > fixing commit: 62cf9bd8118c KVM: nVMX: Fix emulation of VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS. > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.9, v4.19.50. > > v5.1.9: Build OK! > v4.19.50: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 09abb5e3e5e5 ("KVM: nVMX: call kvm_skip_emulated_instruction in nested_vmx_{fail,succeed}") > 09abe3200266 ("KVM: nVMX: split pieces of prepare_vmcs02() to prepare_vmcs02_early()") > 1438921c6dc1 ("KVM: nVMX: Flush TLB entries tagged by dest EPTP on L1<->L2 transitions") > 199b118ab3d5 ("KVM: VMX: Alphabetize the includes in vmx.c") > 1abf23fb42f5 ("KVM: nVMX: use vm_exit_controls_init() to write exit controls for vmcs02") > 327c072187f7 ("KVM: nVMX: Flush linear and combined mappings on VPID02 related flushes") > 3d5bdae8b164 ("KVM: nVMX: Use correct VPID02 when emulating L1 INVVPID") > 3df5c37e55c8 ("KVM: nVMX: try to set EFER bits correctly when initializing controls") > 55d2375e58a6 ("KVM: nVMX: Move nested code to dedicated files") > 5b8ba41dafd7 ("KVM: nVMX: move vmcs12 EPTP consistency check to check_vmentry_prereqs()") > 609363cf81fc ("KVM: nVMX: Move vmcs12 code to dedicated files") > 75edce8a4548 ("KVM: VMX: Move eVMCS code to dedicated files") > 7671ce21b13b ("KVM: nVMX: move check_vmentry_postreqs() call to nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode()") > 945679e301ea ("KVM: nVMX: add enlightened VMCS state") > a633e41e7362 ("KVM: nVMX: assimilate nested_vmx_entry_failure() into nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode()") > a821bab2d1ee ("KVM: VMX: Move VMX specific files to a "vmx" subdirectory") > b8bbab928fb1 ("KVM: nVMX: implement enlightened VMPTRLD and VMCLEAR") > d63907dc7dd1 ("KVM: nVMX: rename enter_vmx_non_root_mode to nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode") > efebf0aaec3d ("KVM: nVMX: Do not flush TLB on L1<->L2 transitions if L1 uses VPID and EPT") > > > How should we proceed with this patch? > > -- > Thanks, > Sasha