Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:05:35 -0700
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Graf <graf@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@xxxxxxxxx>, kvm list <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Graf <graf@xxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <f7f08704-dc4b-c5f8-3889-0fb5957c9c86@intel.com>
References: <20190612170834.14855-1-mhillenb@amazon.de> <eecc856f-7f3f-ed11-3457-ea832351e963@intel.com> <A542C98B-486C-4849-9DAC-2355F0F89A20@amacapital.net> <CALCETrXHbS9VXfZ80kOjiTrreM2EbapYeGp68mvJPbosUtorYA@mail.gmail.com> <459e2273-bc27-f422-601b-2d6cdaf06f84@amazon.com> <CALCETrVRuQb-P7auHCgxzs5L=qA2_qHzVGTtRMAqoMAut0ETFw@mail.gmail.com> <f1dfbfb4-d2d5-bf30-600f-9e756a352860@intel.com> <70BEF143-00BA-4E4B-ACD7-41AD2E6250BE@vmware.com> <f7f08704-dc4b-c5f8-3889-0fb5957c9c86@intel.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:49:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/13/19 10:29 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Having said that, I am not too excited to deal with this issue. Do
> > people still care about x86/32-bit?
> No, not really.

Especially not for KVM, given the number of times 32-bit KVM has been
broken recently without anyone noticing for several kernel releases.

References:
- [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Marius Hillenbrand
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Dave Hansen
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Alexander Graf
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Dave Hansen
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Nadav Amit
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Dave Hansen

Prev by Date: [PATCH v4 5/7] s390: vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP resources to mdev device
Next by Date: [patch 0/5] cpuidle haltpoll driver and governor (v4)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]