Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Intercept VMWRITEs to read-only shadow VMCS fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:18 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Also, while this may vary dynamically based on the L2 guest that is
> running, this is much less true for unrestricted-guest processors.
> Without data on _which_ scenarios are bad for a static set of shadowed
> fields, I'm not really happy to add even more complexity.

Data supporting which scenarios would lead you to entertain more
complexity? Is it even worth collecting data on L3 performance, for
example? :-)



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux