Re: [PATCH] add trace points in irqchip code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/06/2009 04:17 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Add tracepoint in msi/ioapic/pic set_irq() functions,
in IPI sending and in the point where IRQ is placed into
apic's IRR.

Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov<gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
index 1d1bb75..e4bcbdd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
  #include "irq.h"

  #include<linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include "trace.h"

  static void pic_lock(struct kvm_pic *s)
  	__acquires(&s->lock)
@@ -190,6 +191,8 @@ int kvm_pic_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
  	if (irq>= 0&&  irq<  PIC_NUM_PINS) {
  		ret = pic_set_irq1(&s->pics[irq>>  3], irq&  7, level);
  		pic_update_irq(s);
+		trace_kvm_pic_set_irq(irq>>  3, irq&  7, s->pics[irq>>  3].elcr,
+				      s->pics[irq>>  3].imr, ret == 0);

It's better to send undecoded arguments (irq, s, ret) and do the shifting/masking/derefing in the TP_fast_assign. This is because argument preparation is always compiled inline and executed (so I understand; not sure) but TP_fast_assign is out-of-line and only executed if the tracepoint is enabled.
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_pic_set_irq,
+	    TP_PROTO(__u8 chip, __u8 pin, __u8 elcr, __u8 imr, int coalesced),
+	    TP_ARGS(chip, pin, elcr, imr, coalesced),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(	__u8,		chip		)
+		__field(	__u8,		pin		)
+		__field(	__u8,		elcr		)
+		__field(	__u8,		imr		)
+		__field(	int,		coalesced	)
+	),

bool is slightly more descriptive.

+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->chip		= chip;
+		__entry->pin		= pin;
+		__entry->elcr		= elcr;
+		__entry->imr		= imr;
+		__entry->coalesced	= coalesced;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("chip=%u pin=%u (%s%s)%s",
+		  __entry->chip, __entry->pin,
+		  (__entry->elcr&  (1<<  __entry->pin)) ? "level":"edge",
+		  (__entry->imr&  (1<<  __entry->pin)) ? "|masked":"",
+		  __entry->coalesced ? " (coalesced)" : "")
+);

kvm style is not to use equals signs.

+
+	TP_printk("dst=%x vec=%u (%s|%s|%s|%s|%s)",
+		  __entry->dest_id, (u8)__entry->icr_low,
+		  __print_symbolic((__entry->icr_low>>  8&  0x7),
+				   kvm_deliver_mode),
+		  (__entry->icr_low&  (1<<11)) ? "logical":"physical",
+		  (__entry->icr_low&  (1<<14)) ? "assert":"de-assert",
+		  (__entry->icr_low&  (1<<15)) ? "level":"edge",

Spaces around :.

+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(	__u32,		apicid		)
+		__field(	__u8,		dm		)
+		__field(	__u8,		tm		)
+		__field(	__u8,		vec		)
+		__field(	__u8,		coalesced	)
+	),

bool.

+
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_msi_set_irq,
+	    TP_PROTO(__u32 address, __u64 data),
+	    TP_ARGS(address, data),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(	__u32,		address		)

Make this a u64 just in case.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux