Re: [PATCH] kvm: selftests: ucall improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 02:08:31PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:46:35PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Make sure we complete the I/O after determining we have a ucall,
> > which is I/O. Also allow the *uc parameter to optionally be NULL.
> > It's quite possible that a test case will only care about the
> > return value, like for example when looping on a check for
> > UCALL_DONE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Would it make more sense to include the other patch altogether to
> cleanup the existing users of get_ucall() where uc can be NULL?
>

Yeah, I can do that. I'll send a v2 with the cleanup and your r-b.

Thanks,
drew 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux