> On May 20, 2019, at 8:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/05/19 01:35, Nadav Amit wrote: >> I just hope that this support would convince you, and others, to prefer >> (when possible) kvm-unit-tests over the selftest environment. > > kvm-unit-tests are not superseded by selftests; selftests are mostly > meant to test the KVM API. While they are more easily debuggable than > kvm-unit-tests, the benefit is not big enough to justify the effort of > rewriting everything. > > Furthermore, being able to run kvm-unit-tests on bare metal is useful, > even if it's not something that people commonly do, and consistent with > KVM's design of not departing radically for what bare metal does. I understand. And just to clarify - my corporate overload deserves the credit for this work. I just prefer not to shout it too loudly. I’m sorry for not collecting the patches into a set, but I know that it would just cause me to resend all of them for individual patch issue. I still have some more pending patches that I will send after rebasing and cleanup.
