On 16.05.19 08:25, Sironi, Filippo wrote:
>> On 16. May 2019, at 15:56, Graf, Alexander <graf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 14.05.19 08:16, Filippo Sironi wrote:
>>> On x86, we report the UUID in DMI System Information (i.e., DMI Type 1)
>>> as VM UUID.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>>> index 5c93a65ee1e5..441cab08a09d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
>>> #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>>> #include <linux/highmem.h>
>>> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
>>> @@ -694,6 +695,12 @@ bool kvm_para_available(void)
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_para_available);
>>>
>>> +const char *kvm_para_get_uuid(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_UUID);
>> This adds a new dependency on CONFIG_DMI. Probably best to guard it with
>> an #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMI).
>>
>> The concept seems sound though.
>>
>> Alex
> include/linux/dmi.h contains a dummy implementation of
> dmi_get_system_info that returns NULL if CONFIG_DMI isn't defined.
Oh, I missed that bit. Awesome! Less work :).
> This is enough unless we decide to return "<denied>" like in Xen.
> If then, we can have the check in the generic code to turn NULL
> into "<denied>".
Yes. Waiting for someone from Xen to answer this :)
Alex
