Re: [PATCH v5] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 02:35:30AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 06:30 -0700, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> >> > KVM would like to provide x2APIC interface to a guest without emulating
>> >> > interrupt remapping device. The reason KVM prefers guest to use x2APIC
>> >> > is that x2APIC interface is better virtualizable and provides better
>> >> > performance than mmio xAPIC interface:
>> >> >     
>> >> > - msr exits are faster than mmio (no page table walk, emulation)
>> >> > - no need to read back ICR to look at the busy bit
>> >> > - one 64 bit ICR write instead of two 32 bit writes
>> >> > - shared code with the Hyper-V paravirt interface
>> >> >     
>> >> > Included patch changes x2APIC enabling logic to enable it even if IR
>> >> > initialization failed, but kernel runs under KVM and no apic id is
>> >> > greater than 255 (if there is one spec requires BIOS to move to x2apic
>> >> > mode before starting an OS).
>> >> > 
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> 
>> >> Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Now, since this affects core x86 APIC code non-trivially so should 
>> > submitted to and go via the x86 tree. (Can prepare a special branch 
>> > with just this change if KVM tree wants/needs to pull it before 
>> > v2.6.32.)
>> 
>> Please don't separate the x2apic code from the dmar code for this
>> reason.
>> 
>> Supporting hotplug cpus with ioapics is torture.
>> 
> What is the connection between this patch and cpu hotplug?

When I asked if cpu hotplug was a supported and more or
less common feature of kvm I was told it was.

Good cpu hotplug today means supporting interrupt remapping.
(The code you are disabling for kvm).

Therefore I don't see the point of supporting one without the other.
Especially if we don't have a case where on real hardware we need to
split the support.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux