Hi,
On 5/4/19 9:23 PM, Tom Murphy via iommu wrote:
@@ -4181,58 +4168,37 @@ static int intel_iommu_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long val, void *v)
{
struct memory_notify *mhp = v;
- unsigned long long start, end;
- unsigned long start_vpfn, last_vpfn;
+ unsigned long start_vpfn = mm_to_dma_pfn(mhp->start_pfn);
+ unsigned long last_vpfn = mm_to_dma_pfn(mhp->start_pfn +
+ mhp->nr_pages - 1);
switch (val) {
case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
- start = mhp->start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
- end = ((mhp->start_pfn + mhp->nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
- if (iommu_domain_identity_map(si_domain, start, end)) {
- pr_warn("Failed to build identity map for [%llx-%llx]\n",
- start, end);
+ if (iommu_domain_identity_map(si_domain, start_vpfn,
+ last_vpfn)) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to build identity map for [%lx-%lx]\n",
+ start_vpfn, last_vpfn);
return NOTIFY_BAD;
}
break;
Actually we don't need to update the si_domain if iommu hardware
supports pass-through mode. This should be made in a separated patch
anyway.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu