On 4/26/19 4:39 PM, Lendacky, Thomas wrote: > On 4/24/19 11:10 AM, Singh, Brijesh wrote: >> The hypercall can be used by the SEV guest to notify the page encryption > > This hyercall is used by the SEV guest to notify a change in the page... > >> status to the hypervisor. The hypercall should be invoked only when >> the encryption attribute is changed from encrypted -> decrypted and vice >> versa. By default all the guest pages should be considered encrypted. > > By default all guest page are considered > >> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt | 14 +++++ >> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 + >> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 + >> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 ++ >> include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h | 1 + >> 6 files changed, 92 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> index da24c138c8d1..ecd44e488679 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> @@ -141,3 +141,17 @@ a0 corresponds to the APIC ID in the third argument (a2), bit 1 >> corresponds to the APIC ID a2+1, and so on. >> >> Returns the number of CPUs to which the IPIs were delivered successfully. >> + >> +7. KVM_HC_PAGE_ENC_STATUS >> +------------------------- >> +Architecture: x86 >> +Status: active >> +Purpose: Notify the encryption status changes in guest page table (SEV guest) >> + >> +a0: the guest physical address of the start page >> +a1: the number of pages >> +a2: set or clear the encryption attribute > > a2: encryption attribute > >> + >> + Where: >> + * 1: Encryption attribute is set >> + * 0: Encryption attribute is cleared >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> index a9d03af34030..adb0ca035b97 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> @@ -1196,6 +1196,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { >> uint16_t (*nested_get_evmcs_version)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >> >> bool (*need_emulation_on_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >> + int (*page_enc_status_hc)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long gpa, >> + unsigned long sz, unsigned long mode); >> }; >> >> struct kvm_arch_async_pf { >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> index 74b57ab742ad..f024f208b052 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ struct kvm_sev_info { >> int fd; /* SEV device fd */ >> unsigned long pages_locked; /* Number of pages locked */ >> struct list_head regions_list; /* List of registered regions */ >> + unsigned long *page_enc_bmap; >> + unsigned long page_enc_bmap_size; >> }; >> >> struct kvm_svm { >> @@ -1911,6 +1913,8 @@ static void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) >> >> sev_unbind_asid(kvm, sev->handle); >> sev_asid_free(kvm); >> + >> + kvfree(sev->page_enc_bmap); >> } >> >> static void avic_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) >> @@ -7370,6 +7374,69 @@ static int sev_receive_finish(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp) >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int sev_resize_page_enc_bitmap(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long new_size) >> +{ >> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info; >> + unsigned long *map; >> + unsigned long sz; >> + >> + if (sev->page_enc_bmap_size >= new_size) >> + return 0; >> + >> + sz = ALIGN(new_size, BITS_PER_LONG) / 8; >> + >> + if (sz > PAGE_SIZE) >> + map = vmalloc(sz); >> + else >> + map = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > > Any reason this can't always be vmalloc()? > Yes, we can use vmalloc() unconditionally. The bitmap size will be mostly greater than PAGE_SIZE hence the above is useless anyway. >> + >> + if (!map) { >> + pr_err_once("Failed to allocate decrypted bitmap size %lx\n", sz); >> + return 1; > > Should this be -ENOMEM? > >> + } >> + >> + /* mark the page encrypted (by default) */ >> + memset(map, 0xff, sz); >> + >> + bitmap_copy(map, sev->page_enc_bmap, sev->page_enc_bmap_size); >> + kvfree(sev->page_enc_bmap); >> + >> + sev->page_enc_bmap = map; >> + sev->page_enc_bmap_size = new_size; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int svm_page_enc_status_hc(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long gpa, >> + unsigned long npages, unsigned long enc) >> +{ >> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info; >> + gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_end; >> + int r; > > int ret; ? "r" at first confused me. I will fix it in next rev. > >> + >> + if (!npages) >> + return 0; >> + >> + gfn_start = gpa_to_gfn(gpa); >> + gfn_end = gfn_start + npages; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); >> + >> + r = 1; >> + if (sev_resize_page_enc_bitmap(kvm, gfn_end)) > > ret = sev_resize_... > if (ret) > >> + goto unlock; >> + >> + if (enc) >> + __bitmap_set(sev->page_enc_bmap, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start); >> + else >> + __bitmap_clear(sev->page_enc_bmap, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start); >> + >> + r = 0; > > If you do the above, this is not needed. > Yes agreed. thanks