Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] Adding iperf test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 10:16 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> >>>> LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative
> >>>> option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and
> >>>> I don't sure which way is better.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I don't have a clear idea as well. It's currently under
> >>> discussion...
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is KVM x86_64 only?
> >>
> >
> > It's x86-64, i386, ia64, s390, and powerpc 44x/e500 only.
> 
> OK, then it's difficult to see using binaries? Can we not
> compile these on the system at use time (see the client/deps
> directory for other stuff we do this for)

Biggest trouble is compiling the test under windows hosts. We are
figuring out a way to work around this problem.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux