On 26/04/2019 11:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 26.04.19 10:56, Pierre Morel wrote:
When the guest do not have AP instructions nor Key management
we should return without shadowing the CRYCB.
We did not check correctly in the past.
Fixes: b10bd9a256ae ("s390: vsie: Use effective CRYCBD.31 to check CRYCBD
validity")
We should really try to pay more attention, commit b10bd9a256ae already
was supposed to fix 6ee74098201b.
yes, sorry for that.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to documentation and can't verify.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Fixes: 6ee74098201b ("KVM: s390: vsie: allow CRYCB FORMAT-0")
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index c6983d9..ac411e9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
u8 ecb3_flags;
u32 ecd_flags;
int apie_h;
+ int apie_s;
int key_msk = test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76);
int fmt_o = crycbd_o & CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK;
int fmt_h = vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK;
@@ -298,7 +299,8 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
scb_s->crycbd = 0;
apie_h = vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_APIE;
- if (!apie_h && (!key_msk || fmt_o == CRYCB_FORMAT0))
+ apie_s = apie_h & scb_o->eca;
+ if (!apie_s && (!key_msk || (fmt_o == CRYCB_FORMAT0)))
return 0;
if (!crycb_addr)
@@ -309,7 +311,7 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
((crycb_addr + 128) & PAGE_MASK))
return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x003CU);
- if (apie_h && (scb_o->eca & ECA_APIE)) {
+ if (apie_s) {
ret = setup_apcb(vcpu, &vsie_page->crycb, crycb_addr,
vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.crycb,
fmt_o, fmt_h);
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
