Re: [PATCH 24/27] x86/fpu: Add a fastpath to __fpu__restore_sig()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-04-12 19:17:59 [+0200], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > @@ -327,7 +327,19 @@ static int __fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			goto err_out;
> >  		envp = &env;
> > +	} else {
> 
> I've added here:

I would suggest to add it in the last patch once we have the complete
fast path. The other one extended (in case you want to add a comment
there, too).

> +               /*
/**

> +                * Attempt to restore the FPU registers directly from user
> +                * memory. For that to succeed, the user accesses cannot cause

I would say "user access" because it is always a single instruction.

> +                * page faults. If they do, fall back to the slow path below,
> +                * going through the kernel buffer.

"with the enabled page fault handler".

> +                */
> 
> so that it is clear what's happening.
> 
> This function is doing gazillion things again ;-\

It is the old code with disabled page fault handler. But I understand.

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux