On 04/08/2019 01:07 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:02:12 -0400
Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/01/2019 04:38 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
When we get a solicited interrupt, the start function may have
been cleared by a csch, but we still have a channel program
structure allocated. Make it safe to call the cp accessors in
any case, so we can call them unconditionally.
While at it, also make sure that functions called from other parts
of the code return gracefully if the channel program structure
has not been initialized (even though that is a bug in the caller).
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman<farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck<cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Connie,
My series of fixes for vfio-ccw depends on this patch as I would like to
call cp_free unconditionally :) (I had developed my code on top of your
patches).
Could we pick this patch up as well when/if you pick up my patch series?
I am in the process of sending out a v2.
Regarding this patch we could merge it as a stand alone patch, separate
from this series. And also the patch LGTM
Reviewed-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Actually, I wanted to ask how people felt about merging this whole
series for the next release :) It would be one thing less on my plate...
I have been testing with your patches for a while now and I haven't hit
any problems due to the patches.
IMHO I think we can merge the patches for the next release.
Thanks
Farhan
