Re: [PATCH v6 01/20] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:39:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:21:47PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set may not be aligned to unsigned long.
> > Atomic operations (i.e. set_bit and clear_bit) on the bitmaps may access
> 
> Please end function names with parentheses.

Sure.

> 
> > two cache lines (a.k.a. split lock) and lock the bus to block all memory
> 
> not "lock the bus" but "cause the CPU to do a bus lock... "

Sure.

> 
> > accesses from other processors to ensure atomicity.
> > 
> > To avoid the overall performance degradation from the bus locking, align
> > the two variables to unsigned long.
> > 
> > Defining the variables as unsigned long may also fix the issue because
> > they are naturally aligned to unsigned long. But that needs additional
> > code changes. Adding __aligned(unsigned long) is a simpler fix.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> With the above nitpicks addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>

Thank you for your review!

-Fenghua



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux