On 28/03/19 17:40, Jim Mattson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:56 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> P.S. We probably need a kvm-unit-tests or selftests test as >> Hyper-V+secureboot is the only known way to test this atm. > > Yes, please! And the requirement for providing tests of new features > should be applied universally, rather than ad hoc. > Yes, I agree. Unfortunately all this stuff dates before the nice selftests framework (and also asking to write tests is one thing, asking to add SMM support for the framework is another... I'm doing that though). Paolo
