> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 3:21 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] vfio/mdev: Follow correct remove sequence
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:20:33 -0500
> Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > mdev_remove_sysfs_files() should follow exact mirror sequence of a
> > create, similar to what is followed in error unwinding path of
> > mdev_create_sysfs_files().
> >
> > Fixes: 7b96953bc640 ("vfio: Mediated device Core driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_sysfs.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_sysfs.c
> > b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_sysfs.c index ce5dd21..c782fa9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_sysfs.c
> > @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ int mdev_create_sysfs_files(struct device *dev,
> > struct mdev_type *type)
> >
> > void mdev_remove_sysfs_files(struct device *dev, struct mdev_type
> > *type) {
> > + sysfs_remove_files(&dev->kobj, mdev_device_attrs);
> > sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "mdev_type");
> > sysfs_remove_link(type->devices_kobj, dev_name(dev));
> > - sysfs_remove_files(&dev->kobj, mdev_device_attrs);
> > }
>
> Ok, I agree this is good practice, but what qualifies a "Fixes:" tag here? The
> fixes reference is incorrect in any case, 6a62c1dfb5c7 changed the creation
> ordering and didn't update the remove ordering to match, but I still don't
> see an actual problem with the remove ordering that necessitates the tag.
> Please clarify. Thanks,
>
In netdev and rdma subsystem we always follow Fixes tag line whenever there is fix, small or big.
So following good practice is better.
I will fix the tag number in v1.
> Alex
