Hi jean, Jacob,
On 3/21/19 3:13 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On 21/03/2019 13:54, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Jacob, Jean-Philippe,
>>
>> On 3/20/19 5:50 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>>> On 20/03/2019 16:37, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> +struct iommu_inv_addr_info {
>>>>> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_PASID (1 << 0)
>>>>> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_ARCHID (1 << 1)
>>>>> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_LEAF (1 << 2)
>>>>> + __u32 flags;
>>>>> + __u32 archid;
>>>>> + __u64 pasid;
>>>>> + __u64 addr;
>>>>> + __u64 granule_size;
>>>>> + __u64 nb_granules;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * First level/stage invalidation information
>>>>> + * @cache: bitfield that allows to select which caches to invalidate
>>>>> + * @granularity: defines the lowest granularity used for the
>>>>> invalidation:
>>>>> + * domain > pasid > addr
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Not all the combinations of cache/granularity make sense:
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * type | DEV_IOTLB | IOTLB | PASID |
>>>>> + * granularity | | |
>>>>> cache |
>>>>> + * -------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
>>>>> + * DOMAIN | N/A | Y |
>>>>> Y |
>>>>> + * PASID | Y | Y |
>>>>> Y |
>>>>> + * ADDR | Y | Y |
>>>>> N/A |
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info {
>>>>> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_INFO_VERSION_1 1
>>>>> + __u32 version;
>>>>> +/* IOMMU paging structure cache */
>>>>> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB (1 << 0) /* IOMMU IOTLB */
>>>>> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_DEV_IOTLB (1 << 1) /* Device
>>>>> IOTLB */ +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_PASID (1 << 2) /* PASID
>>>>> cache */
>>>> Just a clarification, this used to be an enum. You do intend to issue a
>>>> single invalidation request on multiple cache types? Perhaps for
>>>> virtio-IOMMU? I only see a single cache type in your patch #14. For VT-d
>>>> we plan to issue one cache type at a time for now. So this format works
>>>> for us.
>>>
>>> Yes for virtio-iommu I'd like as little overhead as possible, which
>>> means a single invalidation message to hit both IOTLB and ATC at once,
>>> and the ability to specify multiple pages with @nb_granules.
>> The original request/explanation from Jean-Philippe can be found here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/1497
>>
>>>
>>>> However, if multiple cache types are issued in a single invalidation.
>>>> They must share a single granularity, not all combinations are valid.
>>>> e.g. dev IOTLB does not support domain granularity. Just a reminder,
>>>> not an issue. Driver could filter out invalid combinations.
>> Sure I will add a comment about this restriction.
>>>
>>> Agreed. Even the core could filter out invalid combinations based on the
>>> table above: IOTLB and domain granularity are N/A.
>> I don't get this sentence. What about vtd IOTLB domain-selective
>> invalidation:
>
> My mistake: I meant dev-IOTLB and domain granularity are N/A
Ah OK, no worries.
How do we proceed further with those user APIs? Besides the comment to
be added above and previous suggestion from Jean ("Invalidations by
@granularity use field ...), have we reached a consensus now on:
- attach/detach_pasid_table
- cache_invalidate
- fault data and fault report API?
If not, please let me know.
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks,
> Jean
>
>> "
>> • IOTLB entries caching mappings associated with the specified domain-id
>> are invalidated.
>> • Paging-structure-cache entries caching mappings associated with the
>> specified domain-id are invalidated.
>> "
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jean
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + __u8 cache;
>>>>> + __u8 granularity;
>>>>> + __u8 padding[2];
>>>>> + union {
>>>>> + __u64 pasid;
>>>>> + struct iommu_inv_addr_info addr_info;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +
>>>>> #endif /* _UAPI_IOMMU_H */
>>>>
>>>> [Jacob Pan]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> iommu mailing list
>>>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> iommu mailing list
>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>>
>
