On 26.02.19 13:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/02/19 21:05, Stefan Raspl wrote: >> Previously, we were using the full output of each test for the name, e.g. >> >> ok 104 - intercept: stpx: Program interrupt: expected(4) == received(4) >> >> But that's not a stable testcase name: The "received(4)" might change in case of >> an error. Therefore, we truncate everything after the "expected()". >> Helps in CI environments when comparing with previous output. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Raspl <raspl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hmm, I'd rather fix the testcases... No doubt about that. But to coordinate that in an efficient manner, being able to identify testcases in a unique manner helps, especially when considering automation! Ciao, Stefan
