On 21/02/19 03:24, Sean Christopherson wrote: > A recent series to fix a variety of EPT related bugs[1] introduced a > few new issues of its own. The issues were caught in code review, but > not until the series was applied (Paolo was especially quick on the > trigger that day). For once. :) > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10808887/ > > Sean Christopherson (5): > x86: nVMX: Check the return value of setup_eptp() in setup_ept() > x86: nVMX: Pre-check EPT requirement for unrestricted guest > x86: nVMX: Require WB for the EPT walks when possible > x86: nVMX: Rename EPT setup functions to better convey their scope > x86: nVMX: Add comments to the EPT helper functions > > x86/vmx_tests.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. Paolo
