On 21/02/19 10:48, Stefan Raspl wrote: > Plus this is quite cheap, while a proper solution would require to modify > the kernels, so we can e.g. pass in a counter for the testcase number. Plus > we would probably have to come up with reasonable testcase names, while > this approach simply derives them from each test output. I agree. However, you can still do the output per-testcase and just emit the "plan" (1..$n) as the last line in the TAP file. This would be the best of both worlds. Paolo
