Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: nVMX: Sign extend displacements of VMX instr's mem operands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:39 PM Sean Christopherson
<sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The VMCS.EXIT_QUALIFCATION field reports the displacements of memory
> operands for various instructions, including VMX instructions, as a
> naturally sized unsigned value, but masks the value by the addr size,
> e.g. given a ModRM encoded as -0x28(%ebp), the -0x28 displacement is
> reported as 0xffffffd8 for a 32-bit address size.  Despite some weird
> wording regarding sign extension, the SDM explicitly states that bits
> beyond the instructions address size are undefined:
>
>     In all cases, bits of this field beyond the instruction’s address
>     size are undefined.
>
> Failure to sign extend the displacement results in KVM incorrectly
> treating a negative displacement as a large positive displacement when
> the address size of the VMX instruction is smaller than KVM's native
> size, e.g. a 32-bit address size on a 64-bit KVM.
>
> The very original decoding, added by commit 064aea774768 ("KVM: nVMX:
> Decoding memory operands of VMX instructions"), sort of modeled sign
> extension by truncating the final virtual/linear address for a 32-bit
> address size.  I.e. it messed up the effective address but made it work
> by adjusting the final address.
>
> When segmentation checks were added, the truncation logic was kept
> as-is and no sign extension logic was introduced.  In other words, it
> kept calculating the wrong effective address while mostly generating
> the correct virtual/linear address.  As the effective address is what's
> used in the segment limit checks, this results in KVM incorreclty
> injecting #GP/#SS faults due to non-existent segment violations when
> a nested VMM uses negative displacements with an address size smaller
> than KVM's native address size.
>
> Using the -0x28(%ebp) example, an EBP value of 0x1000 will result in
> KVM using 0x100000fd8 as the effective address when checking for a
> segment limit violation.  This causes a 100% failure rate when running
> a 32-bit KVM build as L1 on top of a 64-bit KVM L0.
>
> Fixes: f9eb4af67c9d ("KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: add checks for #GP/#SS exceptions")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux