Re: [patch] eventfd - revised interface and cleanups (2nd rev)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > That isn't for us to decide. Entire syscalls can be disabled in config.
> 
> That is not a well defined separate syscall though. It's a member/feature 
> of the aiocb.

I don't know what this means, really.

AIO eventfd support is a relatively recently added enhancement to AIO,
is it not?  Applications which continue to use the pre-May07 AIO
features will continue to work as before (they darn well better).  So
for such applications, AIO=y/EVENTFD=n kernels are usable and useful,
and eliminating this option is a loss?

Either way, I believe that this change should be unbundled from the
unrelated KVM one so we can handle it separately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux