Re: [PATCH 3/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix notifier race conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:35:00AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> 
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >> To be honest, I am not sure.  I would guess its not a *huge* deal,
> > >> though it was obviously enough of a concern to at least discuss it.  I
> > >> can definitely say that I think the other issues which are being fixed
> > >> are substantially more important.
> > >>     
> > >
> > > Ok then, will repost the revised patch later today.
> > >   
> > 
> > Ok sounds good.  I did have a chance to take a closer look at your
> > proposal for the key data, and I think it makes a lot of sense.  Do you
> > see it as a problem if we defer adding that?  Or should we try to add
> > that notion now?
> 
> That would need to go eventually via mainline, after some discussion. But 
> yes, I believe that using the "key" as simple bitmask is a little 
> restrictive.
> 
> 
> - Davide

I agree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux