On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:35:00AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > > > > > > > >> To be honest, I am not sure. I would guess its not a *huge* deal, > > >> though it was obviously enough of a concern to at least discuss it. I > > >> can definitely say that I think the other issues which are being fixed > > >> are substantially more important. > > >> > > > > > > Ok then, will repost the revised patch later today. > > > > > > > Ok sounds good. I did have a chance to take a closer look at your > > proposal for the key data, and I think it makes a lot of sense. Do you > > see it as a problem if we defer adding that? Or should we try to add > > that notion now? > > That would need to go eventually via mainline, after some discussion. But > yes, I believe that using the "key" as simple bitmask is a little > restrictive. > > > - Davide I agree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
