Re: [PATCH 19/29] KVM: VMX: Don't save guest registers after VM-Fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/29] KVM: VMX: Don't save guest registers after VM-Fail
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:24:38 +0100
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190118212037.24412-20-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
References: <20190118212037.24412-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20190118212037.24412-20-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1

On 18/01/19 22:20, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +	      : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT, "=ebx"(vmx->fail),

This should be "=b".

Paolo

References:
- [PATCH 00/29] KVM: VMX: Move vCPU-run to proper asm sub-routine
  - From: Sean Christopherson
- [PATCH 19/29] KVM: VMX: Don't save guest registers after VM-Fail
  - From: Sean Christopherson

Prev by Date: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] vfio-ccw: concurrent I/O handling
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 21/29] KVM: x86: Explicitly #define the VCPU_REGS_* indices
Previous by thread: [PATCH 19/29] KVM: VMX: Don't save guest registers after VM-Fail
Next by thread: [PATCH 21/29] KVM: x86: Explicitly #define the VCPU_REGS_* indices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux