Re: [PATCH] kvm: add proper frame pointer logic for vmx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/15/19 2:13 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Hmm, maybe like this:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> index bcef2c7e9bc4..33122fa9d4bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> @@ -26,19 +26,17 @@ ENTRY(vmx_vmenter)
>  	ret
> 
>  2:	vmlaunch
> +3:
>  	ret
> 
> -3:	cmpb $0, kvm_rebooting
> -	jne 4f
> -	call kvm_spurious_fault
> -4:	ret
> -
>  	.pushsection .fixup, "ax"
> -5:	jmp 3b
> +4:	cmpb $0, kvm_rebooting
> +	jne 3b
> +	jmp kvm_spurious_fault
>  	.popsection
> 
> -	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 5b)
> -	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, 5b)
> +	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b)
> +	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, 4b)
> 
>  ENDPROC(vmx_vmenter)

No, that will not work. The problem is in vmx.o where I just sent another patch
for it.

I can see there are five options to solve it.

1) always inline vmx_vcpu_run()
2) always noinline vmx_vcpu_run()
3) add -fdiable-ipa-fnsplit option to Makefile for vmx.o
4) let STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD support part.* syntax.
5) trim-down vmx_vcpu_run() even more to not causing splitting by GCC.

Option 1) and 2) seems give away the decision for user with
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_(PERFORMANCE/SIZE).

Option 3) prevents other functions there for splitting for optimization.

Option 4) and 5) seems tricky to implement.

I am not more leaning to 3) as only other fuction will miss splitting is
vmx_segment_access_rights().



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux