Re: [KVM PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:11:12AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > 
> > > Not really, it's impossible to document all races one have thought
> > > about and avoided.
> > 
> > Well, when some new code has non-trivial locking/racing logics, you better 
> > document it as clearly as possible, akpm announced time ago.
> 
> Absolutely. But IMO documentation in the form of "fields A B C are
> protected by lock X" in a single place near field declaration is better
> than "we take lock X here to protect against race with user thread using
> fields A B C" sprinkled all over the code.

Exactly what akpm suggested. A fat comment on top of the C file describing 
locking logic and pitfalls.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux