On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 03:25:10PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Thanks a lot Paolo for the comments!
I'll fix the issue in next version.
> On 26/12/18 09:25, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > @@ -1233,6 +1252,14 @@ static const ExtSaveArea x86_ext_save_areas[] = {
> > { .feature = FEAT_7_0_ECX, .bits = CPUID_7_0_ECX_PKU,
> > .offset = offsetof(X86XSaveArea, pkru_state),
> > .size = sizeof(XSavePKRU) },
> > + [XSTATE_CET_U_BIT] = {
> > + .feature = FEAT_7_0_ECX, .bits = CPUID_7_0_ECX_CET_SHSTK,
> > + .offset = offsetof(X86XSaveArea, cet_u),
>
> These offsets are incorrect, since supervisor states are only stored in
> the compacted format. In fact, in patch 4, supervisor states should
> return 0 in CPUID(EAX=0Dh,ECX=n).EBX.
>
> You can use offset == 0 to distinguish supervisor and user states, so
> that supervisor states are skipped in xsave_area_size and x86_cpu_reset.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
> > + .size = sizeof(XSaveCETU) },
> > + [XSTATE_CET_S_BIT] = {
> > + .feature = FEAT_7_0_ECX, .bits = CPUID_7_0_ECX_CET_SHSTK,
> > + .offset = offsetof(X86XSaveArea, cet_s),
> > + .size = sizeof(XSaveCETS) },
> > };
> >
> > static uint32_t xsave_area_size(uint64_t mask)
