Re: [PATCH 03/28] KVM: VMX: Alphabetize the includes in vmx.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2018-12-04 10:14-0800, Jim Mattson:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:54 PM Sean Christopherson
> <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ...to prepare for the creation of a "vmx" subdirectory that will contain
> > a variety of headers.  Clean things up now to avoid making a bigger mess
> > in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Are include directives one of the areas where the Linux community
> prefers "reverse fir tree" formatting? Just curious.

Not sure it it's the reverse fir tree, but I think the consensus is to
go from most generic <linux/...> includes; through more specific ones
<linux/sched/...>, <asm/...>, etc.;  and end with includes in the
current directory.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux