2018-12-04 10:14-0800, Jim Mattson: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:54 PM Sean Christopherson > <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ...to prepare for the creation of a "vmx" subdirectory that will contain > > a variety of headers. Clean things up now to avoid making a bigger mess > > in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> > > Are include directives one of the areas where the Linux community > prefers "reverse fir tree" formatting? Just curious. Not sure it it's the reverse fir tree, but I think the consensus is to go from most generic <linux/...> includes; through more specific ones <linux/sched/...>, <asm/...>, etc.; and end with includes in the current directory.
