Re: [RFC] Discuss about an new idea "Vsock over Virtio-net"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2018/11/30 下午8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
   If you want to compare it with
something that would be TCP or QUIC.  The fundamental difference between
virtio-vsock and e.g. TCP is that TCP operates in a packet loss environment.
So they are using timers for reliability, and receiver is always free to
discard any unacked data.
Virtio-net knows nothing above L2, so they are totally transparent to device
itself. I still don't get why not using virtio-net instead.


Thanks
Is your question why is virtio-vsock used instead of TCP on top of IP
on top of virtio-net?



No, my question is why not do vsock through virtio-net.

Thanks




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux