On 11/19/18 9:27 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>> I was really hoping for code comments. :) >> I though we agreed to make those in the larger series because those >> comments in __fpu__restore_sig() would be removed anyway (as part of the >> series). > Also, over local_bh_disable() does not really fit as this is generic > code and Sebastian said ARM does the whole thing a bit differently, for > one. > > We probably should put that comment somewhere prominent in > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c or similar - somewhere people poking at FPU > stuff will see it. Ahh, got it. arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c would be a fine spot.
