On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:21:19PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: > The interface is just ugly IMO. You have eventfd_signal() that can sleep, > or not, depending on the registered ->signal() function implementations. > This is pretty bad, a lot worse than the theoretical us spent in the > schedule_work() processing. I agree. How about the idea of introducing eventfd_signal_from_task which can sleep? Does this sound same? -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
